Llama 3.3 70B vs Claude 3.5 Haiku: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How Llama 3.3 70B (Meta) and Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

Llama 3.3 70B

Input: $0.10 / 1M tokens
Output: $0.32 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio: 3.2×
Context window: 131.072K

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input: $0.00 / 1M tokens
Output: $0.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio: —
Context window: —

The short answer

Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper across the board for typical workloads.

Token pricing side-by-side

Llama 3.3 70B
Claude 3.5 Haiku

Cost at your usage

Avg input tokens / call

Avg output tokens / call

Calls per active user / day: 5

Active days / month: 20

MAU: 1,000

Llama 3.3 70B

Per call

$0.00021

Per user / mo

$0.0210

Total / mo

$21

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Per call

$0.00000

Per user / mo

$0.0000

Total / mo

Claude 3.5 Haiku is cheaper by $0.0210/user/month — a saving of $21/month at 1,000 MAU.

Total monthly bill across MAU

Llama 3.3 70B
Claude 3.5 Haiku

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

Other comparisons

GPT-4o mini vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Claude 3.5 Haiku vs DeepSeek V3 Claude 3 Haiku vs Claude 3.5 Haiku Llama 3.3 70B vs GPT-4o mini Llama 3.1 70B vs Llama 3.3 70B

Comparing Llama 3.3 70B vs Claude 3.5 Haiku on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.