← All comparisons

Fable 5 vs GPT-5.1: token pricing & cost compared (July 2026)

How Fable 5 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.1 (OpenAI) actually compare on price — input, output, and total monthly cost at the MAU you care about. Updated against live OpenRouter pricing.

Anthropic

Fable 5

Input
$10.00 / 1M tokens
Output
$50.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
5.0×
Context window
1,000K

OpenAI

GPT-5.1

Input
$1.25 / 1M tokens
Output
$10.00 / 1M tokens
Output / Input ratio
8.0×
Context window
400K

The short answer

GPT-5.1 is cheaper across the board for typical workloads.

Token pricing side-by-side

Input ($/1M)Output ($/1M)$0$15$30$45$60
  • Fable 5
  • GPT-5.1

Cost at your usage

Fable 5

Per call

$0.03000

Per user / mo

$3.0000

Total / mo

$3,000

GPT-5.1

Per call

$0.00563

Per user / mo

$0.5625

Total / mo

$563

GPT-5.1 is cheaper by $2.4375/user/month — a saving of $2,438/month at 1,000 MAU.

Total monthly bill across MAU

1005001K5K10K50K100K$0$80K$160K$240K$320K
  • Fable 5
  • GPT-5.1

Same usage profile applied to both models; only the per-token price differs.

Run this against your real numbers

The mini-calculator above is a preview. Use the full tools to model power-user blast radius, gross margin, and 12-month spend forecasts.

Comparing Fable 5 vs GPT-5.1 on price alone never tells the whole story — output-token weighting, context length, and your usage profile change the answer dramatically. Use the calculators below for the full picture.

Related tools: All comparisons · Cost Per User Calculator · How to calculate LLM cost per user